Potts v. Potts

Per Curiam.

If it be conceded that the plaintiff, as execu- ' trix of W. A. Potts, is entitled to the opinion and instructions of the court upon the questions • submitted in the complaint, we think the ruling of the court was correct, and that the proper construction has been placed upon the provisions of the will, which -is expressed very plainly, and seems to be free from any doubt.

The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.