The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant’s favor; and there was ample evi*734dence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.
No error.
WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.