Martin Allen Johnson v. United States

24 F.3d 247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Martin Allen JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-35689.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1994.*
Decided April 28, 1994.

Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Martin Allen Johnson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his third motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion, which fully and fairly addressed all the arguments raised in this appeal.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3