dissenting
Based upon the reasoning set forth in Colvin v. Glove American Cas. Co. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 293, I would hold that the insurance company was permitted to reduce the two-year statutory period for instituting an action to one year as it did in the case subjudice, and that the one-year limitation is reasonable in spite of the majority's efforts to distinguish uninsured from underinsured coverage.
Because the provision is reasonable, I dissent.