State ex rel. Halak v. Cebula

Herbert, J.,

concurring in judgment. Courts of Appeal and this court possess original jurisdiction, in quo warranto by virtue of specific constitutional .statement. That particular jurisdiction carries a concomitant responsibility to regulate its use in those courts.

Although I may or may not agree with what the General Assembly has prescribed with relation to the writ, I find it unnecessary to a resolution of this, appeal to perpetuate a view that considers a statute to be the ‘ ‘ authority” by which this classic writ subsists.

Locher, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.