State ex rel. Morrow v. Hill

P. Brown, J.,

concurring. For reasons of judicial *81economy, I, conclude that the question of the propriety of the remedy of quo warranto should not be reached..

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert and Celebrezze, JJ., would remand with instructions to dismiss the cause as being one not properly cognizable in quo warranto. See State, ex rel. Cain, v. Kay (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 15, 309 N. E. 2d 860.