State ex rel. GF Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Clifford F. Brown, J.,

concurring. Because the per curiam opinion recognizes the continuing validity of 'the enigmatic “some evidence” rule (see dissents in State, ex rel. Kilburn, v. Indus. Comm. [1982], 1 Ohio St. 3d 103, at 105-106; State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. [1982], 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, at 399-400 [23 O.O.3d 358]; State, ex rel. Teece, v. Indus. Comm. [1981], 68 Ohio St. 2d 165, at 170-174 [22 O.O.3d 400]), I concur in the judgment only.