dissenting. I find that the attempt by this court to set some standards and guidelines for the open-endedness of the opinion in Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co. (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 131, perhaps is salutary. However, allowing recovery for negligently inflicting mental stress without a showing that such manifested itself with some resulting physical injury still presents too broad a spectrum of recovery. I adhere to my position as expressed in my dissent in Schultz.