concurring. I concur with the judgment of the majority but for reasons other than those expressed by the majority. Having an allegedly “adequate remedy at law” is not a defense to a mandamus action filed pursuant to R.C. 149.43.
Sweeney and Resnick, JJ., concur in the foregoing concurring opinion.State ex rel. Hurt v. Cox
Related Cases
- State ex rel. Shane v. New Philadelphia Police Department
- State ex rel. Harris Graphics Corp. v. Industrial Commission
- State ex rel. Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union, Local 333 v. State Employment Relations Board
- AGF, Inc. v. Great Lakes Heat Treating Co.
- Collinsworth v. Western Electric Co.