Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rogers

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Richard H. Rogers is *285publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (4). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.