the president pronounced the Court’s opinion, that borh judgments be reversed, “ because it does not appear, by the record, that the appellant was bail for the defendant, Hawes ; there being no bail bond,(†) nor a copy thereof, which the law requires should be returned with the writ, and filed with the same in the clerk’s office.”
See Rev. Code, vol, 1. p. 78. sect. 26.; p. 87. sect. 20.; and Rev. Code, vol. 2. p. 17.