dissenting.
The plaintiff, Mr. Andrews, was guilty of negligence which contributed t.o his accident. That phase of this case is forcefully expressed by the trial court, which said:
“It stands out like a sore finger that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.”
From wíiich it follows that he should not recover, whether the Railway be guilty or blameless.
Hudgins, J., concurs in this dissent.