United States v. Thomas

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2009 No. 08-30107 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALVIN THOMAS, III, Also Known as Fot Thomas, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:06-CR-294-10 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. No. 08-30107 The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alvin Thomas, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of Thomas’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the alle- gations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (inter- nal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Thomas’s re- sponse discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. The motion for leave to file the Anders brief under seal is GRANTED. Thomas’s motion for ap- pointment of counsel is DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 2