PER CURIAM.
Defendant, having been convicted of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, appeals, contending that he was deprived of due process by comments the
Page 227
trial judge made in the presence of the jury regarding defendant’s counsel. There is no merit to this contention. Hindman v. Coy, 207 Or 279, 286, 295 P2d 1097 (1956); State v. Jorgensen, 8 Or App 1, 492 P2d 312 (1971), Sup Ct review denied (1972).
Defendant made two other assignments of error. One he abandoned at oral argument before this court; the other does not warrant discussion.
Affirmed.