dissenting.
I do not think that the sweeping language contained in State v. Garcia, 288 Or 413, 605 P2d 670 (1980), holding that a trial judge must affirmatively state reasons for imposing consecutive sentences requires remanding this case for resentencing. The trial judge’s reasons were obvious. Though succinctly stated, they were adequate.
I would not remand this case for resentencing. I would affirm.