Keerins v. Oregon State Penitentiary

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that his right to due process of law was violated because he was not fully informed regarding the applicable law when he admitted violating an institution disciplinary rule. There is no merit to that contention. He also argues that the fine imposed is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.