Chapland v. New York City Board of Elections

Check Treatment

Related Cases

Evans v. Board of Elections
Antoinette Chapland, Isabel Boyle, Individually and as Representatives of the Class of Similarly Situated Individuals, Namely Those Registered Voters Who Were Denied Their Right to Vote in the Primary Election on September 10, 1996 Due to the Failure of the Board of Elections to Properly Provide and Make Accessible the Balloting MacHines and Registration Books During the Course of the Primary Day the 51st Assembly District in the County of Kings and John K. O'hara, Candidate for Public Office of Member of the New York State Assembly in the 51st Assembly District in the County of Kings, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. New York City Board of Elections and Tanya Ruiz, Candidates for the Public Office of Member of the New York State Assembly in the 51st Assembly District in the County of Kings, Felix W. Ortiz, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Coto v. New York City Board of Elections
Lila Gold Howard Lasher Delores Vargas Arcadia Rodriguez Audra Rodriguez Gloria Hacken Paul Podhaizer Howard Babbush Pedro Lamboy, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Michael Feinberg New York City Board of Elections Kenneth Evans, John Sampson Adele Cohen Martin Bromberger, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
A. v. New York Board of Elections

PER CURIAM:

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was taken on submission.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the district court be and it hereby is REVERSED.

On October 1, 1996, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered an order that granted a preliminary injunction directing the continuation of the September 10, 1996 Democratic primary election for certain offices in Kings County in a number of specified election districts. The order of the district court is reversed. No continuation of the primary election shall be held on October 10, 1996. The mandate shall issue forthwith. An opinion in the related case Gold v. Feinberg, Nos. 96-9274, 96-9284, articulating the rationale for this decision will follow.