This court held, in the case of Chumasero v. Gilbert, ante, 293, that the lex fori must govern the rate of interest recoverable on a contract, which contains no agreement for a different amount. Or if the contract was entered into in a State where the law has fixed a greater rate than is allowed by our statute, that fact must be averred and proved, to authorize a recovery of such rate. In these cases it was therefore error to allow seven per cent., the rate allowed by the New York statute, as there was no such averment or proof.
The notes contained no' agreement to pay exchange on New York, in addition to the principal sum. It is true the money, by the terms of the notes,.was payable in the city of New York. But the agreement was to pay the sum of money named, and that was the extent of the maker’s liability, with the legal rate of interest after maturity, if not promptly paid, as a compensation in damages for the delay. No adjudged case has been referred to, and it is believed none can be found, in which it has been held that the plaintiff may, without any agreement, recover exchange between the place, where the recovery is had, and that agreed upon for the payment. Nor do we know of any rule which would authorize it. It was therefore error to allow damages for exchange of New York.
The judgments of the court below are reversed, and the causes remanded.
Judgments reversed.