Michael R. Fuller v. Com. Of Va. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Ann Simpson Jones William Tignor Kathryn Burner Carolyn E. Carlson, State Hearing Officer, Bureau of Customer Services, Social Services Judge Scott, General District Court, Stafford, Virginia Ralph Williams, Sheriff Daniel M. Chichester Allen Bareford, Public Defender's Office Joseph A. Synan Thomas Moncure, Chief Clerk, Circuit Court Scott Bates, Former Secretary of the Commonwealth

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael R. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COM. of Va.; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia; Ann Simpson Jones; William Tignor; Kathryn
Burner; Carolyn E. Carlson, State Hearing Officer, Bureau
of Customer Services, Social Services; Judge Scott, General
District Court, Stafford, Virginia; Ralph Williams,
Sheriff; Daniel M. Chichester; Allen Bareford, Public
Defender's Office; Joseph A. Synan; Thomas Moncure, Chief
Clerk, Circuit Court; Scott Bates, former Secretary of the
Commonwealth, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Michael R. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his request for information under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552 (West 1977 & Supp.1994), as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v. Virginia, No. CA-95-32-R (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED