Castner v. Walrod

Mr. Chief Justice Sheldon,

dissenting:

As respects the bearing of .the act of 1861, known as the Married Woman’s Act, upon the saving clause of the limitation laws, I am disposed to adhere to the former decision of this court, upon this very subject, in Morrison et al. v. Herman et al. 47 Ill. 477, where, upon due consideration, the following result was announced: “We must hold the saving clause of the limitation laws to be unaffected by the act of 1861.”