United States v. Kirk Whittaker

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Dec. 09, 2009 No. 08-16207 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 92-00104-CR-ORL-19KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KIRK WHITTAKER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (December 9, 2009) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Dale, appointed counsel for Kirk Whittaker in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Whittaker’s motion to vacate his sentence for lack of jurisdiction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Whittaker’s motion is AFFIRMED. 2