David Terry Kidd, Jr. v. Benjamin Hawkins Dr. Pierson Sarah Ijams J.A. Smith, Jr. Eddie L. Pearson Pat Edge Douglas Newsome Donna Bevins Mr. McCormick Donna Cumbie Julia Lafoon, and Commonwealth of Virginia Mary Sue Terry Stephen D. Rosenthal Pamela Anne Sargent Virginia Parole Board Clarence L. Jackson Lewis W. Hurst Gail Y. Browne Unknown Members of the Virginia Parole Board Virginia Department of Corrections E.C. Morris Mr. Lawsen Buck Rogers Fred W. Green Dana S. Graham David Graham Cassandra Taylor Mr. Bowen Jack Kincaid Mr. Davenport Ms. Williams Unknown Others, at Brunswick, Virginia, Correctional Center John A. Brown Jacqueline F. Fraser Edward W. Murray

Related Cases

67 F.3d 295

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Terry KIDD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Benjamin HAWKINS; Dr. Pierson; Sarah Ijams; J.A. Smith,
Jr.; Eddie L. Pearson; Pat Edge; Douglas
Newsome; Donna Bevins; Mr. Mccormick;
Donna Cumbie; Julia Lafoon,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
Commonwealth of Virginia; Mary Sue Terry; Stephen D.
Rosenthal; Pamela Anne Sargent; Virginia Parole Board;
Clarence L. Jackson; Lewis W. Hurst; Gail Y. Browne;
unknown Defendants, Members of the Virginia Parole Board;
Virginia Department of Corrections; E.C. Morris; Mr.
Lawsen; Buck Rogers; Fred W. Green; Dana S. Graham;
David Graham; Cassandra Taylor; Mr. Bowen; Jack Kincaid;
Mr. Davenport; Ms. Williams; unknown others, at Brunswick,
Virginia, Correctional Center; John A. Brown; Jacqueline
F. Fraser; Edward W. Murray, Defendants.

No. 95-6309.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided Sept. 13, 1995.

David Terry Kidd, Jr., Appellant pro se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Leigh Thompson Hanes, Peter Duane Vieth, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kidd v. Hawkins, No. CA-93-787-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED