Wright v. State

SHIELDS, Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion. However, while the language of Ind. Appellate Rule 7.2(A)(8)(c) is permissive, as a general rule the failure to use the rule results in waiver of any issue dependent upon the transcript of the evidence and proceedings at trial. Therefore, I separately concur to emphasize the permissive language of the rule can be misleading. See e.g. General Collections, Inc. v. Ochoa (1989), Ind. App., 546 N.E.2d 113.