l. justice of lees. ' I. The first error urged in argument is the admission of certain testimony, and the giving of the fifth of the court’s instructions, involving the question whether the justice was entitled to a fee for an adjournment. The court instructed that “ a justice of the peace is allowed * * * for adjournments, each 50 cents, but such adjournments would not be where it is adjourned from day to day to continue the trial of the same case; it is where the adjournment is at request of either party, such as to enable the party to prepare for trial,” etc.
By section 4152 of the Revision of 1860 it is provided, among other fees to which a justice of the peace shall be entitled, that “ for every continuance or adjournment, at the request of either party,” ■ he shall be entitled to 50 cents, and that he shall also be entitled to certain specified fees in criminal cases. By section 5 of chapter 1, Laws of the extra session of the Eighth General Assembly, section 4152 of the Revision was amended by providing that “ in preliminary examination or trial of criminal cases the justice of the peace shall also be allowed for each day of six hours actually employed,, the sum of $1, and in all cases where the State fails, or where the fees cannot be *128made on execution against the defendant, the same ■•shall be paid by < the county; except in cases where the costs are taxed to the private prosecutor.” „
Construing these several provisions of the statute together, we are of opinion that there was no error in the ruling or instruction complained of. A fair and reasonable interpretation of the language entitles the magistrate to the continuance fee not only in civil cases but also in criminal cases, whether on a trial or preliminary examination.
3_station-eryII. The court, against defendant’s objection, permitted plaintiff to give in evidence the amount and cost of stationery used upon the preliminary examination. Although this item of cost is not specifically mentioned in the statute, yet we are of opinion that it was not intended by the General Assembly that the justice, in cases of this kind, should, without compensation, furnish stationery for a public purpose of this character. The stationery was furnished for the benefit of the public. The public should, therefore, re-imburse the magistrate. It is but simple justice that it should do so. The county is required, as we have seen, in cases of this kind, where the State fails, to pay the fees from the county treasury. And by section 312, subdivision 4 of the Revision, the board of supervisors are to “ settle and allow all just claims against the county, unless otherwise provided by law.” No other provision is made by law for the payment of this claim, and that it is just admits of no doubt.
3. Evidence: tíaSenofntheUS’ peace: fees. III. On the trial, defendant called as a witness A. L. Speer, Esq., a justice of the peace of Boone county, and proposed to show what, in his opinion, would a reasonable time for a magistrate to hear and determine the case of The State v. Taylor. The object of this evidence was to show that, in the opinion of the witness, too much time had been taken up *129and charged for by the plaintiff in the examination. The court, on plaintiff’s objection, excluded the proposed evidence, and we think correctly so. The time within which a preliminary examination before a magistrate may be reasonably concluded, depends so much upon the nature of the charge, the number and character of the witnesses, the conduct of the attorneys engaged therein, and the ability of the examining magistrate, etc., as clearly to show the inadmissibility of opinions of experts.
Finding no error in the record the judgment must be ■
Affirmed.