Steven M. Johnson v. William D. Schaefer, Governor Commissioner Lanham Warden Beshears Captain Burkehart Lieutenant Dennis

Related Cases

Steven M. Johnson v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr., Acting Commissioner Warden Taylor, Maryland House of Corrections Warden Smith, Acting Warden Lieutenant Ratcliff A.G. Johnson, Lieutenant Major Ray Major Murphy Commissioner of Correction Bishop L. Robinson, Commissioner Assistant Warden Hutchinson Major Mitchel Major Williams Captain Rollins Lieutenant Koppel Major Singletary
Johnson v. Maryland Division of Correction
Steven M. Johnson v. Richard A. Laham, Acting Commissioner Warden Taylor, of Maryland House of Corrections Warden Smith, Acting Warden Lieutenant Ratcliff A. G. Johnson, Lieutenant Major Singletary Major Ray Major Murphy
Winston Lloyd, and Mark Hisley Roger Paesch Jimmy Shaver Glenn Barmer Joseph Phrew William J. Gross v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner of Correction Richard Singleton, Warden Maryland House of Correction Queenie Stoop's Supervisor Ii, Classification Counselor Maryland House of Correction, All Sued in Their Own Individual and Official Capacities, Roger Paesch, and Mark Hisley Winston Lloyd Jimmy Shaver Glenn Barmer Joseph Phrew William J. Gross v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner of Correction Richard Singleton, Warden Maryland House of Correction Queenie Stoop's Supervisor Ii, Classification Counselor Maryland House of Correction, All Sued in Their Own Individual and Official Capacities, Jimmy Shaver, and Winston Lloyd Mark Hisley Roger Paesch Glenn Barmer Joseph Phrew William J. Gross v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner of Correction Richard Singleton, Warden Maryland House of Correction Queenie Stoop's Supervisor Ii, Classification Counselor Maryland House of Correction, All Sued in Their Own Individual and Official Capacities, Glenn Barmer, and Mark Hisley Roger Paesch Winston Lloyd Jimmy Shaver Joseph Phrew William J. Gross v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner of Correction Richard Singleton, Warden Maryland House of Correction Queenie Stoop's Supervisor Ii, Classification Counselor Maryland House of Correction, All Sued in Their Own Individual and Official Capacities, William J. Gross, and Mark Hisley Roger Paesch Winston Lloyd Jimmy Shaver Glenn Barmer Joseph Phrew v. William Donald Schaefer, Governor Bishop Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner of Correction Richard Singleton, Warden Maryland House of Correction Queenie Stoop's Supervisor Ii, Classification Counselor Maryland House of Correction, All Sued in Their Own Individual and Official Capacities
Johnson v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William D. SCHAEFER, Governor; Commissioner Lanham; Warden
Beshears; Captain Burkehart; Lieutenant Dennis,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7235.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Schaefer, Nos. CA-94-3153-JFM; CA-94-3267-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED