Michael Rankins, and Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr James Priest Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, Jeff Fossett, and Michael Rankins Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr James Priest Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, Ronald Carter, and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Thomas D. Carr James Priest Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, Thomas D. Carr, and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter James Priest Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, James Priest, and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, Winston Lloyd, and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr James Priest James A. Brittingham, Jr. Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, James A. Brittingham, Jr., and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr James Priest Winston Lloyd Jerome Baylor v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson, Jerome Baylor, and Michael Rankins Jeff Fossett Ronald Carter Thomas D. Carr James Priest Winston Lloyd James A. Brittingham, Jr. v. Ronald Moats, Warden Richard Lanham Bishop Robinson

Related Cases

76 F.3d 375

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael RANKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; Thomas D. Carr; James
Priest; Winston Lloyd; James A. Brittingham,
Jr.; Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald MOATS, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
Jeff Fossett, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Ronald Carter; Thomas D. Carr; James
Priest; Winston Lloyd; James A. Brittingham,
Jr.; Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
Ronald Carter, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Thomas D. Carr; James
Priest; Winston Lloyd; James A. Brittingham,
Jr.; Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
Thomas D. Carr, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; James
Priest; Winston Lloyd; James A. Brittingham,
Jr.; Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
James Priest, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; Thomas D.
Carr; Winston Lloyd; James A. Brittingham, Jr.;
Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
Winston Lloyd, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; Thomas D.
Carr; James Priest; James A. Brittingham, Jr.;
Jerome Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
James A. Brittingham, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; Thomas D.
Carr; James Priest; Winston Lloyd; Jerome
Baylor, Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.
Jerome Baylor, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Michael Rankins; Jeff Fossett; Ronald Carter; Thomas D.
Carr; James Priest; Winston Lloyd; James A.
Brittingham, Jr., Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald Moats, Warden; Richard Lanham; Bishop Robinson,
Defendants--Appellees.

Nos. 95-7256, 95-7257, 95-7258, 95-7259, 95-7260, 95-7261,
95-7262, 95-7263.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Michael Rankins, Jeff Fossett, Ronald Carter, Thomas D. Carr, James Priest, Winston Lloyd, James A. Brittingham, Jr., Jerome Baylor, Appellants Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

2

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rankins v. Moats, No. CA-95-1982-JFM (D.Md. July 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED