77 F.3d 468
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Milton Quentilla DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Correction Director; City of Norfolk,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
David MAPP, Former Sheriff, Defendant.
No. 95-7850.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 28, 1996.
Milton Quentilla Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Murray, No. CA-94-519-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED