Robert Leon Buckner v. Governor of the State of Maryland Baltimore County Police Department Baltimore City Police Department Anne Arundel County Police Department Baltimore County Sheriff's Department Archie Gee, Warden, Patuxent Institution Keith Greene, Officer, Doc Office, Patuxent James M. Dean, Warden, Baltimore County Detention Center Commissioner of Correction of Maryland State Administration Board of Election Laws Unknown Medical Contractor and Correctional Officers Bryant K. Howard, P.A. Doctor Ashby, M.D. Unknown Nurses Ms. Johnson

Related Cases

81 F.3d 148

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Leon BUCKNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; Baltimore County Police
Department; Baltimore City Police Department; Anne Arundel
County Police Department; Baltimore County Sheriff's
Department; Archie Gee, Warden, Patuxent Institution;
Keith Greene, Officer, DOC Office, Patuxent; James M. Dean,
Warden, Baltimore County Detention Center; Commissioner of
Correction of Maryland; State Administration Board of
Election Laws; Unknown Medical Contractor and Correctional
Officers; Bryant K. Howard, P.A.; Doctor Ashby, M.D.;
Unknown Nurses; Ms. Johnson, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7051.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: April 2, 1996.

Robert Leon Buckner, appellant pro se.

Stanley J. Schapiro, Linda T. Cox, County Attorney's Office, Towson, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Buckner v. Governor of Maryland, No. CA-95-159-S (D. Md. June 19, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED