(concurring).
While I was one of the attorneys in the Succession of Maus, 177 La. 822, 149 So. 466, which was overruled by the Succession of Lambert, 210 La. 636, 28 So.2d 1, I perceive the distinction between this case and the Maus Case.
It is my view that the majority opinion in this case effects the intention of the testatrix.
Under the circumstances, I concur.