85 F.3d 638
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raymond M. MILLARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-35954.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 1996.*
Decided May 6, 1996.
Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
We affirm the district court's denial of federal prisoner Raymond M. Millard's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his criminal conviction on double jeopardy grounds.1 See United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir.1995) (administrative forfeiture of unclaimed property does not constitute punishment), petition for cert. filed, No. 95-7955 (February 13, 1996).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Because we affirm the denial of relief under the former version of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we do not consider whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 applies to this appeal