United States v. Charles Burnette Ledford, Jr.

86 F.3d 1153

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Burnette LEDFORD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7832.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 1996.
Decided May 20, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-71; CA-95-300-4)

Charles Burnette Ledford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ledford, No. CR-91-71; CA-95-300-4 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.