Jerome Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial without prejudice of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion, which the district court construed as a second or successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-90-331; CA-93-82 (E.D.Va. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.