ORDER
Before the court are defendant’s motion (# 6) to dismiss or bifurcate and plaintiffs motion (# 9) to remand. They have been fully briefed.
Nor will plaintiffs bad faith claim be dismissed as premature. Pulley v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co., 111 Nev. 856, 897 P.2d 1101 (1995) does not establish a rule that such claims can arise only after the underlying coverage claim has been resolved. In Pulley, the facts upon which the bad faith claim was based did not occur until after the coverage claim was resolved. This is obviously what the Nevada Supreme Court meant when it said, “the transaction giving rise to the bad faith tort action did not occur until after the first ease for benefits under the contract had been settled.” Id. at 859, 897 P.2d 1101. To substitute the verb “does” for “did” in that passage alters its meaning from a statement of operative fact to a rule of law. No such rule of law yet has been declared by the Nevada court. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be denied.
Defendant seeks bifurcation as an alternative. This reasonable request should be accommodated in a manner consistent with minimizing the cost of litigation to the parties and prudent use of this court’s meager time resources1. The parties will prepare both the coverage and the bad faith claims for trial. The coverage issues will then be tried and submitted to the jury. Next, if appropriate in light of the verdict on coverage, the bad faith issues will be tried to the same jury.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motions (# s 6 and 9) to dismiss and remand are denied; the motion (# 6) for bifurcation is granted as set forth above.
1.
This district has four active judges. In 1997, the weighted filings per judgeship were 897, the highest of any district in the Ninth Circuit.