92 F.3d 1184
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Vernon David STROMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6054.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 30, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-313, CA-95-378-3-6BC)
Vernon David Stroman, Appellant Pro Se.
Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. We also find meritless Appellant's allegation that his conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West Supp.1996) should be reversed in light of Bailey v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (Nos.94-7448, 94-7492), because the record reveals evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to support the conviction under Bailey 's "carrying" prong. Id. at 4041-43. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stroman, Nos. CR-94-313; CA-95-378-3-6BC (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED