Ronald Jerry Sawyer v. Ron Angelone Colin Anglicker Lieutenant Johnson Captain Ferguson Lieutenant Hall Captain Hall Bob Stamper Herman L. Wynn Isa Ohara Correctional Conner Officer Thomas Officer Slate Captain Day Lieutenant Sprouse L. Saunders Sergeant Braxton Sergeant Windell Sergeant Stone Officer Hahn Officer Carter Officer Ringold Officer Sprouse H.D. Gouldin Major Boyce Captain Bruce Captain R. Starks R. Smith, Captain Officer Lipscone Lieutenant Rogers Fred Greene Wayne Kincaid Officer McDuffy G.D. Johnson, Major

Related Cases

94 F.3d 642

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Jerry SAWYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE; Colin Anglicker; Lieutenant Johnson;
Captain Ferguson; Lieutenant Hall; Captain Hall; Bob
Stamper; Herman L. Wynn; Isa Ohara; Correctional Conner;
Officer Thomas; Officer Slate; Captain Day; Lieutenant
Sprouse; L. Saunders; Sergeant Braxton; Sergeant Windell;
Sergeant Stone; Officer Hahn; Officer Carter; Officer
Ringold; Officer Sprouse; H.D. Gouldin; Major Boyce;
Captain Bruce; Captain R. Starks; R. Smith, Captain;
Officer Lipscone; Lieutenant Rogers; Fred Greene; Wayne
Kincaid; Officer McDuffy; G.D. Johnson, Major, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6445.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1996.

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sawyer v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1392-R (W.D.VA. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED