(concurring):
10. I join in affirming this conviction since the military judge did not abuse his discretion in ruling on the search issue. Moreover, if he did err, I would still vote to affirm under inevitable discovery as stated in United States v. Roa, 24 MJ 297, 303 (CMA 1987) (Sullivan, J., concurring in the result). See Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 442, 104 S.Ct. 2501, 2508, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).