United States v. Clark

Court: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date filed: 2011-08-31
Citations: 70 M.J. 340, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 721
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

CCA S31842. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F 2011).

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.