Understand the law with legal research AI

United States v. Lumpkins

Court: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date filed: 2012-03-08
Citations: 71 M.J. 183, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 263
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

CCA 201000554. Review granted on the following issue:

DOES AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUS
Page 184
SELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011)?

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Understand legal concepts and procedures, draft documents, and conduct in-depth analysis.

No signup required.