105 F.3d 666
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Paul Peter SCHREY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M.H. CARRILLO, Warden at Wasco State Prison; W.G.
Ledbetter; P.F. Ahuero; Michael Collie; J.
Mack; Lt. Mock, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-16468.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 1996.*
Decided Dec. 19, 1996.
Before SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Paul Peter Schrey appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After a de novo review, see Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 17, 1995.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Schrey's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3