Carlos Guerrero v. Board of Education of the Emery United School District Ronald Mooney Cheryl Bolling Barbara Kryzwicki, Kate Dixon, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant

Check Treatment

Related Cases

Carlos Guerrero v. Board of Education of the Emery United School District Ronald Mooney Cheryl Bolling Barbara Kryzwicki, Kate Dixon, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
Tami Lacayo, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Rebecca Lacayo Rebecca Lacayo Richard Lacayo George Benjamin Frederickson, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Sandra Frederickson Scott Theodore Frederickson, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Sandra Frederickson Sandra Frederickson Larry Frederickson Jackson Hale Bloom, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Kathleen Bloom Kathleen Bloom Richard Dunigan, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Debra Dunigan Christopher Dunigan, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Debra Dunigan Debra Dunigan Paul Dunigan Bryan Smith, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Jolene Smith Jolene Smith Jason Smith Joann McClanahan v. Bill Honig, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State of California, Superintendent California Department of Education Clyde Chantry, in His Official Capacity as Director of Compliance for the California Department of Education the Board of Education for the State of California Joseph Carrabino Marion McDowell in Her Official Capacity as Member of the Board of Education for the State of California
Victor B. Atencio v. Board of Education of Penasco Independent School District No. 4 Candido Mascarenas, George Maestas, Pat Martinez, Wilfred Gallegos, Juan Martinez and Marcel Torres, Individually and as Members of the Board of Education of Penasco Independent School District No. 4
Lana Abu-Sahyun, by and Through Feryal Abu-Sahyun, Her Guardian Ad Litem Feryal Abu-Sahyun, Guardian Ad Litem v. Palo Alto Unified School District, Santa Clara County Office of Education William Honig, Individually and as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, California State Department of Education California State Department of Education
Garcia v. Los Angeles County Board of Education

106 F.3d 407

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Carlos GUERRERO, Plaintiff,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the EMERY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT;
Ronald Mooney; Cheryl Bolling; Barbara
Kryzwicki, Defendants-Appellees,
Kate Dixon, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant.

No. 95-16318.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 1997.*
Decided Jan. 22, 1997.

Before: LAY**, GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

There being no response to the show cause order filed in this case on December 5, 1996, this appeal is DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation