Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Co.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 153 N. Y. Supp. 1128.

MERRELL and FOOTE, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal as to the Consolidated Rendering Company on the ground that it does not appear that said company was polluting the stream in question at the time the action was commenced.