Griffith v. United States

                     IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                             ________________________________

                                        No. 97-4845
                             ________________________________

                                   D.C. Docket No. 94-0147-cv
                                       Bktcy. No. 93-0361
                                                                              FILED
                                                                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                        ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
IN RE: LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH,                                               08/06/99
                                                                         THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                     Debtor.                  CLERK

LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH,

                                                     Plaintiff-Appellant,

               versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                     Defendant-Appellee.

       _________________________________________________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Southern District of Florida
        _________________________________________________________________

                    (Opinion May 11 , 1999, ___ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999)

                                         (August 6, 1999)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA,
BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

               A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in

favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
             IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.eb4845or