Jones v. McNeill

Johnson, J.

I concur generally in this opinion. I am not satisfied however, that under the act of 1824, a sale made by an executor of the goods of his testa- or, would not be valid, as between himself and the purchaser, and it may, I think, well be doubted whether any other than a creditor, legatee or other person beneficially interested, could call it in question — • That question is not necessary to the determination of this case — I shall not therefore express any opinion on if.-