Neely v. City of St. Augustine

ERVIN, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I believe the appeal de novo from the municipal court provided by the city charter is a matter of jurisdiction within the power of the Legislature to prescribe and is not merely a regulation of practice and procedure vio-lative of Sec. 20, Art. Ill, of the State Constitution. See Cates v. Heffernan, 154 Fla. 422, 18 So.2d 11, headnotes 6 and 10, and Farragut v. City of Tampa, 156 Fla. 107, 22 So.2d 645.