Sangester v. State

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, tried by a jury and found guilty of robbery. *586He appeals the judgment and sentence, contending the state failed to prove that he aided and abetted in the crime charged. Upon consideration of that contention in the light of the record and briefs, we conclude otherwise. In our view the evidence adequately supports the verdict and judgment. See Mallory v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 69.

Affirmed.