Affirmed on authority of Schack v. State, 391 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1968), wherein appellant’s contention that he was denied proper dental treatment was rejected.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.Affirmed on authority of Schack v. State, 391 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1968), wherein appellant’s contention that he was denied proper dental treatment was rejected.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.