The issue raised by this appeal is grounded on the admissibility of relevant testimony as to collateral crimes committed by the appellant. Our view of the proceeding in the trial court substantiates the relevancy of the testimony of other crimes, which showed a pattern of criminality. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Hawkins v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 5.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, C. J., and REED and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.