Ignacio Soriano-Lujan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

117 F.3d 1426

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ignacio SORIANO-LUJAN, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 96-70147, Apc-qtc-zux.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 17, 1997.**
Decided June 24, 1997.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

In accordance with Duldulao v. INS, 90 F.3d 396 (9th Cir.1996), we dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction.

3

DISMISSED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3