Dingle v. State

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed See United States ex rel. Catanzaro v. *553Mancusi, 404 F.2d 296 (2nd Cir. 1968); People v. Rhodes, 41 Ill.2d 494, 244 N.E.2d 145 (1969); F.S. Section 924.33, F.S.A.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.