Appellant was found guilty of robbery and sentenced. He later moved for a complete trial transcript which can be afforded only for the purpose of a direct appeal. As the time had expired for the taking of a direct appeal, his motion for trial transcript was considered as having been made pursuant to CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. and was denied as it did not ask for any relief provided for by 1.850.
The order appealed from is hereby affirmed.
HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.